Skip to content

Results-oriented thinking: why good decisions can lose

Results-oriented thinking means judging a decision by what happened instead of by whether it was a good decision with the information you had. It’s one of the most common reasons beginners stop improving.

You have A♠A♥ and go all-in preflop against K♠K♥. You are about an 82% favourite. The board brings a king and you lose.

  • Results-oriented: “Going all-in with aces was a mistake.”
  • Decision-oriented: “Great decision. I’ll lose this 18% of the time.”

The opposite also happens: you call with a weak draw without the right pot odds, hit it, and think the call was good. It wasn’t, and repeating it will cost you money.

  • You stop making good plays after they lose a few times.
  • You repeat bad plays that happened to win.
  • You go on tilt because you feel “unlucky” instead of focusing on what you control.

Four questions instead of “did I win?”

Section titled “Four questions instead of “did I win?””
  1. What did I know at the time (position, stacks, opponent’s range)?
  2. What were my options, and what was each one’s expected value?
  3. Did I have the right odds or fold equity?
  4. Would I make the same decision again with the same information?

Recommended reading: Thinking in Bets by Annie Duke, in our list of the best poker books.

Judging a decision by its outcome instead of by whether it was correct with the information you had.

Was it a mistake if I lost with aces all-in preflop?

Section titled “Was it a mistake if I lost with aces all-in preflop?”

No. Against kings you win about 82% of the time; losing the other 18% is variance, not a mistake.

Review hands without looking at the result, think in expected value and judge your play over thousands of hands.

No. A call without the right odds is a mistake even when it wins.